There needs to be a dialogue to generate a vision of what climate solutions are possible, individually and through our governments. An open dialogue will bring out a fairer picture of the problems at hand, and present a range of perspectives on climate change, engaging a wider range of people. Armed with information, people can find their own answers, instead of feeling disempowered by the decision-making process.

As the search for new (and sustainable) energy sources continues, it is time to consider the possibility that the solution lies not in a shift of energy source, but a shift in energy use. The way we lead our lives is unsustainable, and if we do not exhaust our energy sources, it is just a matter of time before we exhaust other natural resources.

Traditional methods of promoting environmental awareness and supporting the need for eco-minded initiatives have been unsuccessful in fostering longterm change. The narrative of climate change must become one which induces people to change their behaviour quickly. Rather than having a static story of climate change, educators should be promoting a dialogue about the consequences of climate change.

The role of Stonehouse in the current environmental crisis can be manifold - looking at solutions that are currently achievable, as well as strategizing about long-term solutions, and working towards a greater societal shift towards environmentalism. It is not about persuading individuals but creating a dialogue where climate change is a primary concern for governments and individuals alike.

There are many divergent strands of the environmental community, and instead of focusing on coming up with new solutions, there should be a focus on creating alliances between these diverse networks and organizations. Stonehouse aims to be a gathering place where experts can forge new, more effective ways to work together.

In the wake of the economic crisis, governments, economic institutions, and other non-governmental organizations are reconsidering their goals and priorities. This is an opportunity for climate solutions to become a central part of the dialogue on what social reform is necessary.

Dr. Carstedt briefly explains the Responsibility Capacity Index (RCI), and what it means for Canada, as well as other developed nations. With these facts at our disposal it becomes clear that there must be domestic reductions in emissions, but also support for environmentally friendly development in less developed nations. To incite the sort of transformational change necessary, we need to reconceive how we respond to the climate crisis, fostering change on multiple fronts: technological, political, and organizational. Finally, Dr. Carstedt discusses successful climate policies, and the need for a contextualized, timely, relevant approach that considers the issue in a systemic way.

Dr. Carstedt outlines some of the goals of the Stonehouse Summit and some of the questions he wants answered: how to move from data to action plans, how to foster public engagement, what success would look like, and where to locate the Canada-specific windows of opportunity for engagement.

Cara Pike discusses the goals of the Social Capital Project, and the awareness within the environmental movement that there is a disparity between environmental interest and action. With the Social Capital Project, she is researching the barriers to engagement in the environment with an eye to the application of their findings.

Dr. Suzuki talks about creating popular understanding of scientific issues, and his discovery that scientific literacy was not the barrier to creating ecological commitment. He suggests that the next step to fostering environmental commitment must engage people on other levels than rational thought.

StoneHouse Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter for up-to-date news on StoneHouse and the Summit.


© StoneHouse      Terms of Use | Privacy PolicyContact | Help | Newsletter signup